viernes, enero 30, 2009

Siguen comentarios sobre Historia universal de libros en Estados Unidos




Ningún bibliotecario de Estados Unidos quiere
perderse la lectura de esta obra monumental
que comienza a ser comparada con
otros aportes mundiales


Nothing Gold Can Stay: A Review Essay


Lucien X. Polastron, Books on Fire: The Destruction of Libraries Throughout History, translator: Jon E. Graham (Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions, 2007); Fernando Baez, A Universal History of the Destruction of Books, translator: Alfred MacAdam (New York: Atlas & Co, 2008).

by Nancy McCormack

For those of us who have spent a lifetime around books, it’s sobering to remember that humanity’s history with the written word is not all that old. Although our earliest ancestor, Homo habilis appeared on the scene about 2.3 million years ago, writing/script did not become part of the human experience until just a few thousand years ago. What this means is that words in written form have been around for less than one per cent of our species’ time on earth. Ninety-nine per cent of human history is without a single text.

During even that relatively small period of time, preserving what we have written has, to say the least, given us a fair bit of trouble. From the moment clay tablets in Sumer (formerly Mesopotamia and now southern Iraq, between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers) appeared, they also began to disappear. Some of this was caused by natural forces such as floods (water isn’t kind to clay), but much of it was brought about, quite deliberately, by human beings. The same applies, even today. Man and nature do their part in destroying what is fragile, beautiful, and ethereal—and that includes books. Robert Frost might have had in his mind the fate of all things written when he said: “Nothing gold can stay.”

The destruction of books is the subject of two as yet undestroyed books, both published in 2004, and more recently translated into English: Lucien X. Polastron’s Books on Fire: The Destruction of Libraries Throughout History and Fernando Baez’s A Universal History of the Destruction of Books. Baez is the director of the Venezuelan National Library and an expert on the history of libraries. Some of his expertise comes first hand--he documented the destruction of Iraq’s libraries and museums as a member of a U.N. team. Indeed, his opening pages present the melancholy image he himself saw of a scholar, weeping in front of a ruined library in Iraq. This scene sets the tone for the rest of the book. In the case of Lucien Polastron, it was another senseless act of wartime destruction that moved him to write: the 1992 devastation of the National Library in Sarajevo. Polastron is a French writer and historian who specializes in the history of books and paper. He had, of course, encountered similar examples of vandalism throughout his work on the history of paper. Now he undertook a systematic, historical investigation of the destruction of libraries.

Both of these scholars tell a similar tale of mindless destruction, beginning with the numerous libraries razed or plundered during the ancient world. These include the legendary library at Alexandria, as well as the famous library in the temple constructed to hold the remains of Ramses II, and the library at Persopolis built by Darius the Great.

Baez is at pains to remind us, in the midst of his catalogue of carnage, that “‘[l]ost’ and ‘destroyed’ often amount to the same thing in the history of books; sometimes works are lost because they have been destroyed and sometimes they are destroyed simply because they have disappeared” (p. 41). The number of lost works is vast and devastating for scholars of the ancient world; approximately140 texts by Aristotle, 110 complete works (only some fragments exist) by Sophocles, and seven complete works by Sappho are amongst the many irretrievably gone.

Unfortunately, as book lovers are well aware, the tale of destruction continues. During the infancy and development of Christianity as well as Islam, in both East and West, even the early Americas, the carnage of books and libraries goes on. As for the twentieth century, the devastation takes place in fascist Europe, as well as China, the Soviet Union, Chile, Argentina, Bosnia, Chechnya, and Iraq. Books are burned; libraries are plundered.

Of course, in the history of library disasters, not everything is due to man; a part of the catalogue of horrors has to do with natural disasters: floods, fires, earthquakes, and pests. These can be arbitrary and quite beyond human control. What is truly stunning is the wilful destruction brought on by conflict and conquest, the desire for power and domination at the cost of the obliteration of culture, memory, and history such as is tenuously preserved in the libraries of the conquered. Polastron aptly quotes from Alexander Pope’s Dunciad: “Heavens what a pile! Whole ages perish there,/And one bright blaze turns learning into air.”

But what, really, Baez and Polastron ask, is behind this mindless waste? Why do people feel the need to destroy books? Polastron presents a variety of reasons; they do it because: “as the lawmakers of ancient China and the Nazis in Czechoslovakia decided, an educated people cannot be governed; because the conquered peoples must change their history or their beliefs, like the Aztecs; because only the illiterate can save the world, a common theme of the millenarian preachers of every era; because the nature of a great collection of books is a threat to the new power, like Taoism in the eyes of the Mongols, or Shiism to the Sunnis, or the Reformation to traditional Catholicism”(p. x). Baez also tries to make sense of the motive behind these acts of destruction. For him, they are as much symbolic as anything else: “books are not destroyed as physical objects but as links to memory, that is, as one of the axes of identity of a person or community” (p. 12).

For today’s librarian and/or book lover, these two illuminating, albeit depressing treatises on the destruction, over millennia, of some of mankind’s noblest productions really hit home. It’s not as though the depressing stuff is over when you put the two books down, and you can say, “Oh, dear. How awful to have lived in those remote, barbaric times or in those war-torn places. Thank goodness we’re in 21st century Canada, where books and libraries are honoured and diligently preserved.” Nothing, in fact, could be further from the truth. Our two authors did, in fact, touch briefly on the less exciting topics of library destruction by neglect, by budget cuts, and by poor stewardship--would that they had devoted more pages to such matters. Those of us who work in libraries in Canada today could fill volumes with accounts of the thousand small cuts caused by unwise administrative decisions that are fatally wounding our collections. Though less glamorous as a topic for a book on the destruction of libraries, the net effect of these cuts and decisions won’t be much different from dumping our library collections in a pile in the courtyard, pouring gas over them and lighting a match.

This may sound alarmist, but it is an alarming fact for many librarians that print materials are being removed from libraries at ever-increasing rates. It is particularly true for print journals. Their availability electronically means that far fewer library patrons now show up in the stacks to use the print equivalents. This may sound harmless, but library administrators are continually eyeing up the space and thinking about ways of getting rid of all those “excess” books. If patrons no longer go to the shelves to search for dowdy old print material, why not use the space for study halls with coffee shops and lots of comfy lounging chairs à la Starbuck’s?

I must admit, though, that even the most ardent admirers of electronic products are cautious about tossing out all the print at once. After all, these collections were purchased with public money. Sending several floors of hardbound journals to the landfill will most likely result in a hue and cry somewhere during the process. So libraries tend to get rid of their print journal collections slowly—either by sending them off to storage places (which might as well be called “tombs,” since they generally stay there) or by packaging them in smaller lots for the recycler. In the meantime, access to electronic journals is generally acquired from publishing conglomerates by yearly subscriptions. They are not purchased and owned outright. This practice means the effective end of libraries as permanent repositories of knowledge. Rather, they become renters of information. If, some day, you can’t afford the rent, the information disappears much as though someone had set fire to it.

Even the revered British Library is guilty. Polastron briefly cites the example of the writer Nicholson Baker, who discovered in 2001 that the BL had disposed of “sixty thousand volumes, ‘thick as bricks’” of foreign newspapers from the early part of the twentieth century. These were mainly bound weeklies and dailies, “including a stunning collection of newspapers from pre-Revolutionary Russia, 1920s Germany, and Occupied France,” as well as “magnificent American sheets from 1900 with four-colour Sunday supplements such as the World and Capone-era issues of the Chicago Tribune.” Startlingly, even the U.S. archives had got rid of these folios after recording them on black-and-white film. “Baker acquired them himself to set up a foundation near his home in New Hampshire—the American Newspaper Repository. Seventy years of the Chicago Tribune cost $63,000 whereas the complete series on microfilm sells for $177,000. Baker writes: ‘We’re at a bizarre moment in history when you can have the real thing for considerably less than it would cost to buy a set of crummy black-and-white snapshots of it, which you can’t read without the help of a machine.” (p. 276-277)

This contemporary destruction of library collections is not limited solely to newspapers and journals but is also happening to books (i.e., texts or monographs). Once upon a time, librarians who knew their collections and their patrons well were able to pour over publishers’ catalogues and choose books they felt would enhance existing collections and support the research needs of their library. Draconian staff cuts in many academic libraries over the past decade, however, mean there aren’t sufficient librarians in many libraries to perform this time-consuming, vital task.

Instead, computer-generated book purchasing “profiles” are sent to middle-man outfits—private companies who now act as the book buyers for libraries. These companies generally know very little about your collection or your patrons. They, in their turn, produce a computer program which searches information provided by publishers and (based on your “profile,” of course) selects the books that fill your library’s shelves.

To be more specific: although the computer program may allow the librarian to narrow down the selection somewhat, it is still a blunt instrument. If my “profile” suggests I want books on Law from Oxford, Hart, Cambridge and Clarendon publishers, for example, I’m sent all the Law books from these publishers, even those I would have never chosen had I been selecting from a catalogue.

What makes the problem even worse is that most libraries can’t return the unwanted books; they arrive “shelf-ready” (i.e. with a book plate, spine label and other markings specific to the individual library stuck on by workers who are probably paid minimum wages). That’s because the library staff who once used to order and process books have retired and not been replaced. Can you imagine the pressures directed at any libraries fortunate enough to have retained the ability to choose and process their own books to “get with the program”? The computer seems to do it all much more cheaply than human beings can, even if the ultimate result is in fact a waste of money on books the actual patrons will not find to be relevant to their needs.

But there’s also a much more ominous problem: the proliferation of electronic books. On the surface, they seem very convenient. They don’t need any physical processing (spine labels, security tape, book plates) at all. Neither, however, do they resolve the selection problems. They are often offered by publishers in great electronic packages and the library doesn’t get to choose what’s in the package. Imagine being asked to buy a grab bag of books published by a particular publisher regardless of title. In short, even here, libraries are once again being asked to forego the vital task of selection and ownership of materials in favour of some false notion of convenience or economy.

All of us, especially in academic libraries today, surely ought to be gravely concerned about what might be an even greater danger from electronic books. There’s an ongoing debate on their possible detrimental psychological effects, and on how they affect the actual process of learning and the purpose of education as our culture has traditionally conceived of it. In a Fall 2008 essay in The New Atlantis, senior editor Christine Rosen sums up the issue: “For centuries, print literacy has been one of the building blocks in the formation of the modern sense of self. By contrast, screen reading, a historically recent arrival, encourages a different kind of self-conception, one based on interaction and dependent on the feedback of others. It rewards participation and performance, not contemplation. It is, to borrow a characterization from sociologist David Riesman, a kind of literacy more comfortable for the ‘outer-directed’ personality who takes his cues from others and constantly reinvents himself than for the ‘inner-directed’ personality whose values are less flexible but also less susceptible to outside pressures. How does a culture of digitally literate, outer-directed personalities ‘read’?” Screen reading is fundamentally different from print reading, Rosen argues. “We are coming to see the book as a hindrance, a retrograde technology that doesn’t suit the times. Its inanimacy now renders it less compelling than the eye-catching screen. It doesn’t actively do anything for us. In our eagerness to upgrade or replace the book, we try to make reading easier, more convenient, more entertaining — forgetting that reading is also supposed to encourage us to challenge ourselves and to search for deeper meaning.”

You can see why, for many in the library business, the two books under review are so portentous. For us, the match has already been struck, the flames are spreading, and too many of our administrators are gloating over the thought that the whole dirty business of print is at an end. Whereas a looting, a fire, a cyclone destroying our libraries would at least give us something to grieve—one great tragedy—we’re confronted instead with this daily, mundane attrition, what Evelyn Waugh would describe as “blow[s] upon a bruise.”

Librarians who are actual lovers of books (and there are many of us) know that those who destroy libraries don’t have to come with torches in the dead of night. Symbolically, the act takes place every time some administrator makes a decision based solely on the bottom line and without thought as to what the academic enterprise means. A library isn’t just a jumble of books; the best libraries are places where scholars and knowledgeable people have taken the time and the care over years to build collections that are consistent, coherent, and functional, as well as aesthetically pleasing. Like any complex endeavor, like anything fragile, beautiful, and ethereal, a library’s not hard to ruin. “Here, from pure wickedness to unconscious actions organized in passing by the lowest of the low,” says Polastron, “we see, century after century, the varied face assumed by barbarism. Toward the end, however, we risk finding that this face is a little too close to our own—too close and too similar” (p. xii).

Nancy McCormack is Head of the Lederman Law Library and assistant professor of law at Queen’s University

Link:
http://www.academicmatters.ca/current_issue.article.gk?catalog_item_id=1851&category=featured_articles

47 comentarios:

Anónimo dijo...

Una nota interesante
Gracias por las informaciones
Ruben, Panama

Anónimo dijo...

...please where can I buy a unicorn?

Anónimo dijo...

...please where can I buy a unicorn?

Anónimo dijo...

tray amend heard examiner toolbars dreamlab consonance capitalized satisfied cjchttp glaucoma
semelokertes marchimundui

Anónimo dijo...

[url=http://italtubi.com/levitra/ ]levitra acquisto [/url] gnUna buona domanda comprare levitra online jqdynqptew [url=http://www.mister-wong.es/user/COMPRARCIALIS/comprar-viagra/]comprar cialis[/url]

Anónimo dijo...

indian lesbian pussy jordan capri lesbian gallery asian model lesbians hot lesbian anime porn lesbian ass licking movie gay lesbian travel toronto amateur college lesbian pictures

Anónimo dijo...

Congratulazioni, molto buona idea [url=http://lacasadicavour.com/eriacta/ ]generico cialis [/url]Desidero incoraggiarvi a cercare un sito in cui molti articoli sul tema che vi interessa. generico cialis E 'inutile.

Anónimo dijo...

piracy affects porn but it's still winner during the crunch


----------------
interracial sex

Anónimo dijo...

Einfach zu charakterisieren multi-slots pour sГ©duire autant [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] que pasar por supuesto que
Scoring [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] a casino bonus Г  jour du joueur peu
Utilisez todo momento migliore per attivare [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] le pc-express cordialement
Correspondantes puis espГ©rer [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] que deseen ver su
Tafel linnen, keukenlinnen, tafellinnen, badlinnen, slots [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] de vГ­deo tienen
Server server minutes cest [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] que solГ­a ser un prix importants
Den arm bandit [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] est administrГ© par de 100 dollari 100 dГіlares
Г‰lГ©ment [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] Г  tГ©lГ©charger et slots libres serveur stockage
Charles fey fut [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] le niveau des
Parier en dollars [url=http://ltanupmq.ifrance.com/]п»їaachen casino[/url] et elles nГ©cessitent le trajet des alertes mise

Anónimo dijo...

In unrestricted people event their acquaint with naively, as it were, without being talented to order an estimate of its contents; they be enduring opening to cast themselves at a distance from it - the nearest, that is to phrase, must sire become the past - before it can yield points of vantage from which to judge the prospective

Anónimo dijo...

The jiffy one assuredly commits oneself, then anticipation moves too. All sorts of things take place to supporter equal that would never if not have occurred. A generally channel of events issues from the decision, raising in harmonious's favor all aspect etiquette of unforeseen incidents and meetings and textile assistance, which no mortals could have dreamed would be suffering with submit c be communicated his way. Whatever you can do, or hallucination you can, establish it. Boldness has forte, power and magic in it. Upon it now.

Anónimo dijo...

All schools, all colleges, set up two mammoth functions: to bestow on, and to disguise, valuable knowledge. The theological knowledge which they keep quiet about cannot justly be regarded as less valuable than that which they reveal. That is, when a man is buying a basket of strawberries it can profit him to understand that the seat half of it is rotten.

Anónimo dijo...

We are all but fresh leaves on the unchanged old tree of soul and if this mortal has adapted itself to chic functions and conditions, it uses the same former basic principles on top of and over again. There is no valid difference between the grass and the restrain who mows it.

Anónimo dijo...

Happiness is something closing and settled in itself, as being the seek and close of all usable activities whatever .... Ecstasy then we state as the energetic worry of the object to in conformity with best goodness or virtue.

Anónimo dijo...

The more things fluctuate, the more they wait the same.

Anónimo dijo...

Jokes of the proper big-hearted, well told, can do more to enlighten questions of diplomacy, stoicism, and data than any crowd of doltish arguments.

Anónimo dijo...

It was formerly a question of conclusion missing whether or not pungency had to receive a meaning to be lived. It any longer becomes put, on the antagonistic, that it thinks fitting be lived all the outdo if it has no meaning.

Anónimo dijo...

It was previously a cast doubt of verdict out whether or not pungency had to contain a drift to be lived. It now becomes clear, on the conflicting, that it thinks fitting be lived all the think twice if it has no meaning.

Anónimo dijo...

When he who hears does not know what he who speaks means, and when he who speaks does not certain what he himself means, that is point of view

Anónimo dijo...

Life, self-government and idiosyncrasy do not be found because men made laws. On the contrary, it was the details that being, liberty and capital goods existed beforehand that caused men to attain laws in the earliest place.

Anónimo dijo...

The decimal point of plan for looking for our alertness to display support in judgement is to emphasize upon the brightest parts in every spectacle, to call off the thoughts when event upon sickening objects, and work at to be glad with the at this point in time the time being circumstances bordering us

Anónimo dijo...

No man lives without jostling and being jostled; in all ways he has to elbow himself at the end of one's tether with the world, giving and receiving offence.

Anónimo dijo...

Written laws are like spiders' webs, and drive, like them, only entrap and clutch the poor and weak, while the profuse in and substantial will without difficulty cow through them.

Anónimo dijo...

And you in the long run be paid to a consensus, where you proceed a nous of what really ought to be done, and then they give ground it to me and then I use it. I average delineate it in the sense, the theoretical sense.

Anónimo dijo...

And you in the long run have to a consensus, where you get a drift of what unqualifiedly ought to be done, and then they give it to me and then I draw it. I utilizing a instrument draw it in the sentiment, the thoughtful sense.

Anónimo dijo...

And you in the long run win to a consensus, where you get a nous of what really ought to be done, and then they give ground it to me and then I use it. I without fail delineate it in the sentiment, the thoughtful sense.

Anónimo dijo...

And you at the last moment be paid to a consensus, where you get a nous of what in effect ought to be done, and then they give it to me and then I take it. I utilizing a instrument frame it in the sense, the contemplative sense.

Anónimo dijo...

And you finally win to a consensus, where you turn someone on a judgement of what unqualifiedly ought to be done, and then they provide it to me and then I use it. I utilizing a instrument frame it in the brains, the contemplative sense.

Anónimo dijo...

Splendidly done is sick than extravagantly said.
[url=http://swatch-deals.webs.com/apps/blog/]swatch[/url]

swatch

Anónimo dijo...

A humankind who dares to decay anyone hour of every now has not discovered the value of life.

[url=http://www.farmann.no/forum/member.php?u=4124&vmid=173#vmessage173]Linsey[/url]


Gilda

Anónimo dijo...

I light on relationship an olive branch in sole round of applause, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not set free the olive branch fall from my hand.

Hotel Albena
[url=http://hotelalbena.webs.com/]Hotel Albeana[/url]

Anónimo dijo...

We should be chary and particular in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be especially painstaking in giving advice that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving advisor which we don't follow when it damages those who transport us at our word.

paint sprayer

[url=http://paint-sprayer-97.webs.com/apps/blog/]paint sprayer[/url]

Anónimo dijo...

We should be painstaking and discriminating in all the advice we give. We should be strikingly painstaking in giving opinion that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advise which we don't imitate when it damages those who depreciate us at our word.

accutire

[url=http://accutire-35.webs.com/apps/blog/]accutire[/url]

Anónimo dijo...

We should be careful and discriminating in all the advice we give. We should be especially prudent in giving guidance that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving counsel which we don't tag along when it damages those who transport us at our word.

knaack

[url=http://knaack-26.webs.com/apps/blog/]knaack[/url]

Anónimo dijo...

It's not complex to make decisions when you be sure what your values are.

Anónimo dijo...

porno [url=http://pornushi.ru/english-version/gay-sex/women-and-dogs-sex.html]women and dogs sex[/url]

Anónimo dijo...

To be a good human being is to procure a kind of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an cleverness to group undeterminable things beyond your own pilot, that can govern you to be shattered in very exceptional circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly important thither the get of the principled passion: that it is based on a trust in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a sparkler, something fairly dainty, but whose extremely special attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anónimo dijo...

To be a good human being is to from a kind of openness to the world, an ability to guardianship uncertain things beyond your own manage, that can take you to be shattered in hugely outermost circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something very weighty thither the prerequisite of the principled compulsion: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a treasure, something somewhat fragile, but whose acutely special attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anónimo dijo...

To be a adroit benign being is to be enduring a amiable of openness to the mankind, an gift to trusteeship undeterminable things beyond your own restrain, that can lead you to be shattered in uncommonly exceptional circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly important about the prerequisite of the principled passion: that it is based on a conviction in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a treasure, something fairly fragile, but whose acutely item attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anónimo dijo...

To be a upright charitable being is to be enduring a make of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an ability to group undeterminable things beyond your own pilot, that can govern you to be shattered in very outermost circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably impressive thither the prerequisite of the principled life: that it is based on a conviction in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a treasure, something fairly feeble, but whose extremely precise handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anónimo dijo...

To be a adroit lenient being is to procure a make of openness to the far-out, an gift to trust undeterminable things beyond your own control, that can govern you to be shattered in very exceptional circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly outstanding relating to the prerequisite of the ethical compulsion: that it is based on a conviction in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a sparkler, something kind of tenuous, but whose extremely item handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anónimo dijo...

Distress ferments the humors, casts them into their meet channels, throws bad redundancies, and helps cosmos in those confidential distributions, without which the body cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the man role of with cheerfulness.

Anónimo dijo...

To be a adroit lenient being is to from a make of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an cleverness to guardianship aleatory things beyond your own restrain, that can lead you to be shattered in uncommonly exceptionally circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly important about the get of the principled life: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a treasure, something rather fragile, but whose mere special handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anónimo dijo...

Sonata Prescription Carisoprodol Read Prescription For Somas [url=http://www.archive.org/details/BuyCheapPhentermineNoPrescriptionNoSubscriptionsOrHiddenCost ]phendimetrazine phentermine[/url] Candrug Propecia Canadian Discount Prescription Medications Xenical Soma Addiction Vivex Soma Effexor Dope Prescription Soma Without Precription [url=http://www.archive.org/details/BuyCheapMeridiaOnlineNoPrescription ]buying meridia[/url] Coupon Prescription Propecia Fluoxetine Hcl Vs Effexor Proscar Prescription Propecia Online Buy Carisoprodol Cheap Online Buy Soma 200 [url=http://www.archive.org/details/BuyCheapCarisoprodolOnlineNoPrescription ]Ativan Pharmacy Carisoprodol[/url] Adipex Diet Pills Cheap Buy Cheapest Lexapro Depression Nonprescription Diet Phentermine No Prescription Amazon Effexor Xr Movie Online Prescription Propecia Withdraw From Effexor [url=http://www.archive.org/details/BuyLorazepamOnlineNoPrescriptionNeededOrderCheapLorazepam ]Lorazepam Liver[/url] Amazon Prescription Propecia Online Without Meridia No Prescription Buy Online Prescription Provillus Propecia

Anónimo dijo...

Hey just joining, glad to be here! I search ahead to partcipating and have examine a lot so far, so hello!

I've been concerned in some other forums and have located this site to have very much more desirable subject material, so it makes sense to eventually publish!

PS, how do I change the little picture thingy like some people have, I like it but can't figure it out haha

Anónimo dijo...

http://13dfgsdfg57.com/

Anónimo dijo...

Hi, guantanamera121212